STAAR EOC Performance Levels

The STAAR EOC Performance Levels Report provides up to a 5-year display of academic performance at the all campus level that can be filtered to specific campus, grade level, student population, ethnicity and gender.

Normalization of previous years standards to current standard

Readiness standards have been normalized across years for Prior to 2016-17 Standards that were not reported using the new state standard of Did Not Meet, Approaches, Meets and Masters as follows:

Prior to 2016-17 Standard Not Met = Did Not Meet
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Level II Phase in I = Approaches
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Level II Phase in II = Meets
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Masters = Masters

 

Explanation of represented readiness values

Aggregated values for each tested subject are not calculated by scale score but rather by subject readiness standards coded in the data file. Due to the new standards reported within the data file for tested students, there are students that can be counted more than once within the reported values of readiness.

Example:

John Doe scored a 4122 scale score in his 9^th grade Algebra I exam which falls under the ‘Meets’ category. In the data file he is scored as a ‘1’ in both ‘Approaches’ as well as ‘Meets’. So you will see John Doe counted once under the Approaches Category and once under the Meets Category.

 

Data file value representation on report for all subjects

Meets Grade Level in (subject) = No (0) >> Reported Academic Readiness = Did Not Meet

Meets Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1) >> Reported Academic Readiness = Meets

Approaches Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1) >> Reported Academic Readiness = Approaches

Masters Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1) >> Reported Academic Readiness = Masters

Total Tested (Non-Duplicate Count) – This count does not count each instance per student per subject. If a student is counted as tested in a subject they are counted only once and represented in this count.

EOC Repeaters Report

Only the most recent score for a student in each of spring, summer or fall will be displayed.

Example 1
Johnny has taken the EOC Algebra I test 3 times.
Test 1 – Spring
Test 2 – Summer
Test 3 – Summer
The results of test 1 would be displayed in the Spring Column. The results of test 3 would be displayed in the summer column. Test 2 results would not be displayed. The fall column would be blank.

Example 2
If a student took an EOC test 5 times, 1 in the spring and 2 times in the summer and 3 times in the fall.
The results of the first test would be displayed in the Spring Administration column and results of the third would be displayed in the summer column, the results of the fifth test would be displayed in the fall columns. (Results of first summer test and first and third fall would not be displayed) Only the most recent score for an administration will be displayed.

Student Name

Spring Administration 15
Scale Score
Did Not Meet
Approaches
Meets
Masters

Summer Administration 16
Scale Score
Did Not Meet
Approaches
Meets
Masters

Fall Administration 13
Scale Score
Did Not Meet
Approaches
Meets
Masters

Course Sequence & Pass Fail Indicator Code – From Summer PEIMS Course Completion Record

Pass Fail Indicator Codes:
00 – Not Applicable
01 – Course Was Passed And Credit Was Received
02 – Course Was Failed And No Credit Was Received – First Occurrence This School Year
03 – Course Was Failed And No Credit Was Received – Second Occurrence This School Year
04 – Course Was Passed, But Credit Was Not Received Due To Excessive Absences – First Occurrence This School Year
05 – Course Was Passed, But Credit Was Not Received Due To Excessive Absences – Second Occurrence This School Year
06 – Course As Passed, But Credit Was Not Received (other parts of the course have not been taken)
07 – Course Was Passed, But Credit Was Not Received (other parts of the course have been taken but not passed)
08 – Course Was Failed, But Credit Was Received (other parts of the course have been passed and credit was awarded based on the grades in those parts)
09 – Course Work Is Incomplete And No Credit Has Been Awarded
10 – Course Was Passed, But Credit Was Not Received (course had previously been passed, and was repeated for better mastery)
11 – Course Was Failed And No Credit Was Received – third occurrence this school year
12 – Course Was Passed, But Credit Was Not Received Due To Excessive Absences – third occurrence this school year
13 – Non-High School Course Passed
14 – Non-High School Course Failed

This report provides district and campus level summary reports derived from uploaded assessment files in a similar layout to the released state of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Summary Report. Results can be filtered by the following items:

• Subject
• Year
• Grade
• Administration
• Campus
• Teacher (Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection must be uploaded into File Center)
• Language
• Test Version
• Linguistically Accommodated

STAAR EOC Analysis Report
This report provides district and campus level summary reports derived from uploaded assessment files in a similar layout to the released state of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Summary Report. Results can be filtered by the following items:

• Subject
• Year
• Grade
• Campus
• Teacher
  • Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection must be uploaded into File Center
• Language
• Percent
  • Entered percent value determines the color coding of the reported heat map values. Percentages that fall under your entered % value will appear in red. Percentages that fall above your entered % value will appear in green.
• Reporting Categories
• Content Student Expectations (CSE)
  • CSE details can be viewed by clicking on the hyperlink by category.
• Individual Items
  • Breakdown by individual Reporting Category by Item Number by CSE

Achievement Vs. STAAR Growth Matrix

The Achievement vs. STAAR Growth Matrix report displays a matrix of “Student Performance Level” by “STAAR Growth.” Students are listed in the matrix depending on where how they performed on the assessment.

Data Source:

• It’s important to note you must choose between the Pearson CAF (Cumulative Assessment File) or your district Pearson results files. When choosing the CAF file you may see campuses listed that are not in your district. The CAF will include students who tested at other districts but are counted as part of your districts accountability sub-set.
• Teacher comes from the Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection which must be uploaded into File Center

Note; In Order for the system to calculate the points needed for the student to move to the next level the user must run the report for a specific grade level. There must also be data present for each of the following fields, subject, year, scale score and language. If any of these fields are blank in the data file the system cannot calculate the needed points.

Example ;

	Not Met Growth	Met Growth	Exceeded Growth	Growth Unavailable
Met Level III Commended
Met Level II Recommended		Bob Smith (1795) +12	Mary Hera (1851)
Level II Not Passed

– Bob smith has a scale score of 1795 points; he needs 12 more points to move up to the “Met Level I Recommended”
– Mary Hera has a scale score of 1851 but the system could not calculate points needed to move up.
– The report categories and results will vary based on the parameters chosen.

**2017_STAAR_Calculating_Progress_Measure.pdf —–>DOWNLOAD

This report looks across all uploaded STAAR files that have been uploaded into the file center and provides a list of the highest achieved scale score in each subject by student for a selected year.

This report does not look across by cohort year.

This list evaluates every administrated testing file that has been uploaded to the file center and displays the Pass/Fail indicator as well as the highest scale score the student has achieved within that given subject up to the filtered year selected. The Pass/Fail status is determined by the yearly data file format location of met or not met.

notes moved to manual

https://manuals.ondatasuite.com/index.php/users-manual/#students-met-standard-counts

STAAR 110 Percent Report

This report finds all current year students coded in PEIMS as At-Risk that had a failing grade in the prior year STAAR assessment file. The listed report will provide columns to show the previous year associated failed assessment values

Immediately following the previous year column values, the list will report any new test value that has been uploaded into the system by associated tested subject.

Example: If a student failed EOC Biology in Spring and Fall of 2016 it will list the last fail score value of the previous year as Failed Month: Fall. It will then look at the latest test scores available to determine if the student tested in the subject again.

NOTE: In cases where the assessment instrument differs from the previous year the associated new test score will be matched by assessment instrument.

Example: If a student failed STAAR 3-8 Reading and passed Eng 1 EOC the next year they get a Y for meet

 

110% Prior to current year association crosswalk

Attention: The 100% report has been updated to now reflect a students 110% met value only if a student has two records which align with the “110% Prior to current year association crosswalk” chart which can be found in the report notes.

Example: Prior to the release of the 11.8 update, a student that tested in writing in grade 4 would be matched against their grade 3 reading exam scores to determine if they met at 110%. If the students reading score was failed and the students writing was met at 110% this would create an indicator that the student met the 110% criteria. This would be in error.

As of update (11.8) a student that tests in grade 4 writing that fails will stay on as at risk and will have to wait until they test in grade 7 to determine if they passed at 110%.

 

How to view prior year to current year assessment results in report.

This report contains a lot of extra information about both the prior year and current year tested subject for informational purposes only.

The prior year met/not met references the final score for the student and will be semi-highlighted in orange. Not all current year ‘At Risk’ students failed an assessment the prior year so this report will list students with both ‘Y’ and ‘N’ score values.

For those students that have a ‘N’ in the prior year assessment met/not met column follow the line across to the current year met 110 percent column to see if they met the 110% requirement. If there is a ‘Y’ this means they failed the prior year but met the current year at 110%. If there is an ‘N’ that means they failed the prior year and they did not meet the 110% for the current year. Even if they passed the current year, the needed to pass at 110%

Current Year Met 110 Percent Column
The current year met 110 percent column will show a value for all students who are on the list regardless of prior year status. It is just there to confirm if the student passed at 110%.

Filter Options
This report may be filtered at the campus level

 

Items to consider if you feel you are missing associated test results
If you are not seeing an associated reported value either for the previous year or the current test cycle, please revisit your file center files to ensure that the most updated assessment values have been uploaded into your database.

 

Consider Exporting Table for further extraction
This report can be exported to an excel file and from there you can filter by all the prior year met/not met column to all ‘N’ values and then filter the current year met 110 percent column to either ‘Y’ or ‘N’  or you can just filter by the last column value and look for all the ‘Y’ values to see who failed the prior year but met at 110% for the current year.

 

 

STAAR Test Administered Report

The STAAR Test Administered Report requires two items to run: The name of the Teacher which comes from the Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection and the year the test was administered. It then returns a list of students that match the requested criteria as well as:

Student ID, Name, Grade, Subject, Time of Year Administered, Raw Score, Scaled Score, Level II Satisfactory (Green Checkmark for Yes, Red X for No), Level III Advanced (Green Checkmark for Yes, Red X for No).

After the report is run you can filter/search by typing your search/filter criteria in the associated boxes below the column titles. You can also use the Search box in the upper right corner of the report to search the entire report (not just one column). You can also sort by the individual columns by clicking the on the column titles. Each click on a column flips between sorting ascending and descending sorts for that column.

Clicking on the Student ID link will load the associated Student profile.

STAAR EOC Differential Report

The STAAR EOC Differential Report provides a side by side comparison for each campus by grade tested, by subject for the last two years. The %Met value is color coded by met level and the +/- value shows if there were any gains or losses per subject from the prior year to current year standard scores. Consideration of any yearly state changes to subject scoring should be considered at the local level when reviewing these results.

Overview of report item results as displayed:

Total Tested Column= Total number of students scored as STAAR (S) and Scored (S)

Total Met Column = Total number of students scored as STAAR (S) and Scored (S) with a met value of (1) for any Approaches, Meets or Masters.

% Met Column = Total Met / Total Tested

+/- Column = Difference between % Met Columns

STAAR EOC Academic Performance

The STAAR EOC Academic Performance Report provides up to a 5-year display of academic performance at the all campus level that can be filtered to specific campus, grade tested level, student population, ethnicity and gender.

Normalization of previous years standards to current standard

Readiness standards have been normalized across years for Prior to 2016-17 Standards that were not reported using the new state standard of Did Not Meet, Approaches, Meets and Masters as follows:

Prior to 2016-17 Standard Not Met = Did Not Meet
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Level II Phase in I = Approaches
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Level II Phase in II = Meets
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Masters = Masters

 

Explanation of represented readiness values

Aggregated values for each tested subject are not calculated by scale score but rather by subject readiness standards coded in the data file. Due to the new standards reported within the data file for tested students, there are students that can be counted more than once within the reported values of readiness.

Example:

John Doe scored a 4122 scale score in his grade 9 Algebra I exam which falls under the “Meets” category. In the data file he is scored as a “1” in both “Approaches” as well as “Meets”.
So you will see John Doe counted once under the Approaches Category and once under the Meets Category.

 

Data file value representation on report for all subjects

Approaches Grade Level in (subject) = No (0); Reported Academic Readiness = Did Not Meet

Meets Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1); Reported Academic Readiness = Meets

Approaches Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1); Reported Academic Readiness = Approaches

Masters Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1); Reported Academic Readiness = Masters

Total Tested (Non-Duplicate Count) This count does not count each instance per student per subject. If a student is counted as tested in a subject they are counted only once and represented in this count.

 

Represented Percentage Values

Represented percentage values per subject are calculated by taking the subject academic readiness value divided by the total non-duplicate total tested count.

STAAR 3-8 Accommodations

This report provides the aggregate counts of reported testing accommodations per subject. These values are derived from the assessment data files coded as follows:

• General Accommodations (GA) 1 = Yes 0 = No
• Braille (BR) 1 = Yes 0 = No
• Large Print (LP) 1 = Yes 0 = No
• Oral Administration (OA) 1 = Yes 0 = No
• Extra Day (XD) 1 = Yes 0 = No
• Linguistic Accommodations (LA) 1 = Yes 0 = No
• Standardized Oral Administration 1 = Yes 0 = No

STAAR 3-8 Performance Levels

The STAAR 3-8 Performance Levels Report provides up to a 5-year display of academic performance at the all campus level that can be filtered to specific campus, grade level, student population, ethnicity and gender.

Normalization of previous years standards to current standard

Readiness standards have been normalized across years for Prior to 2016-17 Standards that were not reported using the new state standard of Did Not Meet, Approaches, Meets and Masters as follows:

Prior to 2016-17 Standard Not Met = Did Not Meet
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Level II Phase in I = Approaches
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Level II Phase in II = Meets
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Masters = Masters

 

Explanation of represented readiness values

Aggregated values for each tested subject are not calculated by scale score but rather by subject readiness standards coded in the data file. Due to the new standards reported within the data file for tested students, there are students that can be counted more than once within the reported values of readiness.

Example:

John Doe scored a 1732 scale score in his 8^th grade reading exam which falls under the ‘Meets’ category. In the data file he is scored as a ‘1’ in both ‘Approaches’ as well as ‘Meets’. So you will see John Doe counted once under the Approaches Category and once under the Meets Category.

 

Data file value representation on report for all subjects

Meets Grade Level in (subject) = No (0) >> Reported Academic Readiness = Did Not Meet

Meets Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1) >> Reported Academic Readiness = Meets

Approaches Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1) >> Reported Academic Readiness = Approaches

Masters Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1) >> Reported Academic Readiness = Masters

Total Tested (Non-Duplicate Count) – This count does not count each instance per student per subject. If a student is counted as tested in a subject they are counted only once and represented in this count.

STAAR Summary Report
This report provides district and campus level summary reports derived from uploaded assessment files in a similar layout to the released state of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Summary Report. Results can be filtered by the following items:

• Subject
• Year
• Grade
• Administration
• Campus
• Teacher (Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection must be uploaded into File Center)
• Language
• Test Version
• Linguistically Accommodated

This report provides district and campus level summary reports derived from uploaded assessment files in a similar layout to the released state of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Summary Report. Results can be filtered by the following items:

• Subject
• Year
• Grade
• Test Version
• Language
• Campus
• Teacher of Record (Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection must be uploaded into File Center)
• Ethnicity
• Focus List
• Display Type
  • Responses – Breakdown by individual Reporting Category by SE by Item Number
  • Ethnicity/Sub Pops – Breakdown of percentage of correct responses compared to all responses for ethnicity and sub populations (SPED, Eco Dis, LEP)

Achievement Vs. STAAR Growth Matrix

The Achievement vs. STAAR Growth Matrix report displays a matrix of “Student Performance Level” by “STAAR Growth”.  Students are listed in the matrix depending on where how they performed on the assessment.Data Source:  It’s important to note you must choose between the Pearson CAF (Cumulative Assessment File) or your district Pearson results files.  When choosing the CAF file you may see campuses listed that are not in your district. The CAF will include students who tested at other districts but are counted as part of your districts accountability sub-set.

Note; In Order for the system to calculate the points needed for the student to move to the next level the user must run the report for a specific grade level.  There must also be data present for each of the following fields, subject, year, scale score and language. If any of these fields are blank in the data file the system cannot calculate the needed points.

Example ;

	Not Met Growth	Met Growth	Exceeded Growth	Growth Unavailable
Met Level IIICommended
Met Level IIRecommended		Bob Smith  (1795) +12	Mary Hera (1851)
Level IINot Passed

– Bob smith has a scale score of 1795 points; he needs 12 more points to move up to the “Met Level I Recommended”- Mary Hera has a scale score of 1851 but the system could not calculate points needed to move up.- The report categories and results will vary based on the parameters chosen.

**2017_STAAR_Calculating_Progress_Measure.pdf —–>DOWNLOAD

STAAR Frequency Distribution Report

Graphical representation of student performance on particular assessment chosen by user for particular filters selected.

Left Axis = Scale Score

Bottom Axis = # of students

Four Columns on Right correspond to row on chart.

RAW = Raw Score equivalent for the scale score.

FREQ = Number of students achieving scale score.

CUM = Cumulative Number of students achieving scale score.

PCT = % of total students achieving scale score.

CUM = Cumulative % of total students achieving scale score.

STAAR 110 Percent Report

This report finds all current year students coded in PEIMS as At-Risk that had a failing grade in the prior year STAAR assessment file. The listed report will provide columns to show the previous year associated failed assessment values for: subject, year, administration month, grade tested, raw score and associated campus.

Immediately following the previous year column values, the list will report any new test value that has been uploaded into the system by associated tested subject.

Example: If a student failed EOC Biology in Spring and Fall of 2016 it will list the last fail score value of the previous year as Failed Month: Fall. It will then look at the latest test scores available to determine if the student tested in the subject again.

If they did not, the reported row will be blank. If they did, it will show the new raw score, the calculated exit raw score required to pass at 110% and the final value of met exit of Y= Yes , N=No or ND = No Determination available.

NOTE: In cases where the assessment instrument differs from the previous year the associated new test score will be matched by assessment instrument.

Example: If a student failed STAAR 3-8 Reading and passed Eng 1 EOC the next year they get a Y for meet

 

Filter Options
This report may be filtered at the campus level

 

Items to consider if you feel you are missing associated test results
If you are not seeing an associated reported value either for the previous year or the current test cycle, please revisit your file center files to ensure that the most updated assessment values have been uploaded into your database.

 

STAAR Test Administered Report

The STAAR Test Administered Report requires two items to run: The name of the Teacher which comes from the Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection and the year the test was administered. It then returns a list of students that match the requested criteria as well as:

Student ID, Name, Grade, Subject, Time of Year Administered, Raw Score, Scaled Score, Level II Satisfactory (Green Checkmark for Yes, Red X for No.), Level III Advanced (Green Checkmark for Yes, Red X for No.).

After the report is run you can filter/search by typing your search/filter criteria in the associated boxes below the column titles. You can also use the Search box in the upper right corner of the report to search the entire report (not just one column). You can also sort by the individual columns by clicking the on the column titles. Each click on a column flips between sorting ascending and descending sorts for that column.

Clicking on the Student ID link will load the associated Student profile.

STAAR 3-8 Differential Report

The STAAR 3-8 Differential Report provides a side by side comparison for each campus by grade tested, by subject for the last two years. The %Met value is color coded by met level and the +/- value shows if there were any gains or losses per subject from the prior year to current year standard scores. Consideration of any yearly state changes to subject scoring should be considered at the local level when reviewing these results.
Overview of report item results as displayed:

Total Tested Column = Total number of students scored as STAAR (S) and Scored (S)

Total Met Column = Total number of students scored as STAAR (S) and Scored (S) with a met value of (1) for any Approaches, Meets or Masters.

% Met Column = Total Met / Total Tested

+/- Column = Difference between % Met Columns

STAAR 3-8 Academic Performance

The STAAR 3-8 Academic Performance Report provides up to a 5-year display of academic performance at the all campus level that can be filtered by gender, ethnicity, special pops, grade tested level, specific campus, focus list, and administration.

Normalization of previous years standards to current standard

Readiness standards have been normalized across years for Prior to 2016-17 Standards that were not reported using the new state standard of Did Not Meet, Approaches, Meets and Masters as follows:

Prior to 2016-17 Standard Not Met = Did Not Meet
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Level II Phase in I = Approaches
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Level II Phase in II = Meets
Prior to 2016-17 Standard Masters = Masters

 

Explanation of represented readiness values

Aggregated values for each tested subject are not calculated by scale score but rather by subject readiness standards coded in the data file. Due to the new standards reported within the data file for tested students, there are students that can be counted more than once within the reported values of readiness.

Example:

John Doe scored a 1732 scale score in his grade 8 reading exam which falls under the “Meets” category. In the data file he is scored as a “1” in both “Approaches” as well as “Meets”.
So you will see John Doe counted once under the Approaches Category and once under the Meets Category.

 

Data file value representation on report for all subjects

Approaches Grade Level in (subject) = No (0); Reported Academic Readiness = Did Not Meet

Meets Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1); Reported Academic Readiness = Meets

Approaches Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1); Reported Academic Readiness = Approaches

Masters Grade Level in (subject) = Yes (1); Reported Academic Readiness = Masters

Total Tested (Non-Duplicate Count) This count does not count each instance per student per subject. If a student is counted as tested in a subject they are counted only once and represented in this count.

 

Represented Percentage Values

Represented percentage values per subject are calculated by taking the subject academic readiness value divided by the total non-duplicate total tested count.

These reports were created to assist with the disaggregation of the STAAR Interim Assessment.

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) has created free, optional online interim assessments that align to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). The STAAR Interim Assessments are a TEA-provided tool to help educators tailor instructional practice to address students’ needs. These assessments will be available at no cost to districts and charter schools, and they are not tied to accountability.

Reporting Category Grouping

The reporting category will group all associated Student Expectations by reporting category that were tested for the specified administration. Note that the Teacher of Record is pulled from the Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection.

RC MAST % – Reporting Category Mastery % is provided at the end of each grouped row which represent the total number of test items scored correctly over the total number of test items. Items that were missed will be highlighted in red.

RC MAST Total % – At the bottom of each list an RC Mastery # Total % calculates the grouped reporting category row met values over the entire grouped reporting category tested values to provide a total percentage for the found reporting category.

Example: Reporting Category 1 RC 1 Mast %
Student A: 8 tested items correct / 8 tested items = 100%
Student B: 7 tested items correct / 8 tested items = 87.5%
Student C: 6 tested items correct / 8 tested items = 75.0%
Student D: 8 tested items correct / 8 tested items = 100%
Total: 29 total tested items correct / 32 tested items = 90.6%

 

Student Expectation (SE) Category Grouping

The Student Expectation (SE) category will group all associated Student Expectations by reporting category item number that were tested for the specified administration.

SE % Total– At the bottom of each list an SE total % calculates the grouped SE row met values over the entire grouped SE tested values to provide a total percentage for the found SE.

Example: SE % Total
Total: 13 total tested SE items correct / 16 total tested SE items = 81.2%

 

Overall Total Grouping

The overall % correct by row
The overall % correct by row represents the total number of missed items, total tested items and total correct responses per row for all reporting categories.

The overall total %
The overall total % correct represents the total number of missed items, total tested items and total correct responses for all rows for all reporting categories.

Example: SE % Total
142 total tested items Correct / 160 total tested items = 88.7%

 

The STAAR Analysis Report allow you to review each tested item by the following selected areas:

Test Subject
Test Year
Tested Grade
Test Version
Test Language
Campus
Teacher of Record – Class Roster Winter Enrollment collection must be uploaded into File Center
Ethnicity
Focus List
Display Type

Mastery – Overall percentage of reporting category at achieving mastery
SE Mastery – Overall percentage of grouped SE number mastery within a category

Responses Breakdown (default)
Item Mastery – Overall percentage of total responses within a given item number determined by total met / total responses

 

 

Ethnicity/Sub Pops Breakdown
Item Mastery – Overall percentage of total correct responses within a given item number’s ethnicity/sub pop determined by total correct responses / total responses

The SAT list report provides a list view of all uploaded SAT information. The report is searchable by

Assessment Date (positions 659-668)
As defined by college board data layout
We report assessment dates by year, month, and day (YYYY-MM-DD). Every set of scores reported includes the student’s assessment date and grade level when assessed.

Report Date (positions 2582-2591)
As defined by college board data layout
This field indicates the date a student’s score record was generated into the file. The date of report, like all other date fields, is in the YYYY-MM-DD format. It can be used to determine the most recent information when multiple records
are created for the same student.

Grade ( Positions 669-670)
As defined by college board data layout
Grade level when assessed is a student self-reported field.

Education level when taking the SAT. Code values:
1 = Not yet in 8th grade
2 = 8th grade
4 = 9th grade
5 = 10th grade
6 = 11th grade
7 = 12th grade
8 = No longer in high school
10 = No response
11 = Unknown
12 = 1st year of college
13 = 2nd year of college

To view the latest College Board Data File Layout visit this link. ( Posted as of 07/24/2019)

https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/pdf/data-layout-sat-subject-tests-esr.pdf

This report will list all students who have been reported in the Fall PEIMS submission of the selected year and who are/were eligible to take an STAAR ALT2 EOC exam. (Grades 7 and up).

STAAR Alt2 assessment data file code locations 390 and 391 will be used to determine pass level displayed

Failed All Levels – Displayed as N
If 390-390 LEVEL II: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE = 0 or blank AND 391-391 LEVEL III: ACCOMPLISHED ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE = 0 or blank

Passed Test Level II – Displayed as L2
If 390-390 LEVEL II: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE = 1 AND 391-391 LEVEL III: ACCOMPLISHED ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE = 0 or blank

Passed Test = Level III – Displayed as L3
If 391-391 LEVEL III: ACCOMPLISHED ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE = 1

This report associates student MAP assessment data to student demographic data in PEIMS / TSDS

Population Total – Derived from PEIMS

RIT Score Average – Average (MAP Field – Test RIT Score)

Percentile Average – Average (MAP Field – Test Percentile)

Average Observed Growth – Average (MAP Field – Observed Growth)

Count MET Projected Growth Yes – Count (MAP Field – Met Projected Growth = ‘Y’)

Count MET Projected Growth *Yes – Count (MAP Field – Met Projected Growth = ‘*Y’)

Count MET Projected Growth No – Count (MAP Field – Met Projected Growth = ‘N’)

Count MET Projected Growth *No – Count (MAP Field – Met Projected Growth = ‘*N’)

Count MET Projected Growth – Count (MAP Field – Met Projected Growth = ‘Y’ and ‘*Y’)

Percent of Student Met Projection
“Calculation
Sum (MAP Fields – ‘Y’+’*Y) /
Sum ( MAP Fields – ‘Y’+’*Y’+’N’+’*N’)”